Pace’s future depends on how much investment is available. ReVision explores what the suburban network could look like under different funding scenarios — from modest improvements to a full transformation.
42% of jobs
42% of jobs
37% of jobs
56% of jobs
7% Increase
86% Increase
30% Increase
A few more routes
Nearly all routes
A few more routes
Most routes
Only a few
Maintains Increased Frequency
Most routes run on Sunday
Maintains Increased Frequency
Maintains Increased Frequency
This represents a 10% increase in service, bringing Pace close to pre-COVID levels. Key improvements include:
With funding to increase service by over 50%, this network would focus on high-demand corridors. Key features:
This version also increases service by over 50%, but spreads it wider to reach more places. Key features:
Each scenario reflects a different goal — and level of investment. They show how strategic funding decisions can unlock access, improve equity, and better connect the region.
San Antonio’s land is not equally productive — and that has big consequences for the city’s financial health. Urban3’s analysis flips the script on how we typically measure value. Instead of simply looking at the total tax revenue from a property, they ask: how much value is produced per acre of land? When you consider land as a finite resource, this question becomes crucial. Just like we wouldn’t judge a car by how far it can go on one tank without knowing the size of the tank, we shouldn’t judge development by its total value without considering how much space it consumes.